QUESTION: I’d love to listen to your authorized feedback on Trump’s immunity declare.
EP
ANSWER: I’d strategy this from a geopolitical and sensible method. Trump MUST be utterly immune from bringing any legal or civil expenses towards him by the federal government when he’s President – sure, even when he killed somebody and shot them on TV. Why do I take such an excessive view? As a result of every time the president is charged by the federal government, it’s for political causes. The indictment course of is severely flawed, whereby they will allege something and indict a ham sandwich as a result of they solely give one facet.
They’ll criminally cost you with homicide or your partner, and the justification is you had some argument, and so they haul in your neighbors who say they haven’t seen your partner ever since. You are actually indicted; the press says you killed your partner. And earlier than any trial, you’re FOUND GUILTY BY THE PRESS, prejudicing everybody and the jury.
ONLY CONGRESS MAY PROSECUTE THE PRESIDENT BY IMPEACHMENT
I take this place to PROHIBIT prosecutors from bringing any expenses towards a President due to the abuse of energy and the collapse of the rule of legislation. That is political—not justified in a land ascribing to Due Strategy of Legislation. The Democrats ought to have sought an impeachment continuing alleging the information. THEY DID NOT! Why?
I’ll report on all the 2020 election, and it might shock you that this was all levels, for they needed the January 6ers to storm the Capital, which allowed Pelosi to declare an EMERGENCY and droop all the foundations to certify the vote. There’s a wealth of proof that there have been different folks within the constructing who have been authorities brokers. Apart from that, a transcript has been suppressed, which demonstrates WHY the Committee couldn’t impeach Trump, in order that they let the Justice Division do this to intervene within the election. if Trump used this proof, he could be discovered harmless, however that might be too late for the 2024 election. As reported by Epoch Times:
A beforehand hidden transcript of an interview performed by a U.S. Home of Representatives panel that investigated the Jan. 6, 2021, breach of the U.S. Capitol has been revealed, undermining a committee declare.
Anthony Ornato, who was the White Home deputy chief of employees throughout the breach, instructed the committee that he overheard Mark Meadows, who was then chief of employees, on the cellphone with Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser. In line with the transcript, Mr. Meadows needed to make sure Ms. Bowser “had all the things she wanted.”
Mr. Meadows “needed to know if she want[ed] any extra guardsmen,” Mr. Ornato testified. “And I keep in mind the quantity 10,000 arising of, ‘The president needs to just remember to have sufficient.’ You already know, ‘He’s prepared to ask for 10,000.’ I do not forget that quantity. Now that you simply mentioned it, it jogged my memory of it.”
Within the oral argument within the Supreme Courtroom, Justice Sonia Sotomayor identified what she noticed as a contradiction underlying former President Donald Trump’s protection of whether or not he’s immune from prosecution in a case charging him with plotting to overturn the outcomes of the 2020 presidential election. Trump’s authorized staff argued that presidents can’t be prosecuted for “official acts” dedicated whereas in workplace except they’re each impeached and convicted by the U.S. Congress. Justice Elena Kagan requested even when a president ordered a navy coup or bought nuclear secrets and techniques to a overseas energy, he couldn’t be held criminally liable with out an act of Congress, his legal professional, John Sauer, argued.
I believe Trump’s legal professionals are surprisingly claiming Congress has to cross a statute with a “clear assertion” masking such acts that straight apply to the president. In any other case, their legal responsibility could be moot. I’m afraid I disagree with the assertion that Congress can empower the Justice Division to carry legal expenses towards any president. They’re UNELECTED, and Congress can not bestow such political energy on any unelected company that circumvents the We the Folks. The DOJ represents particular pursuits or the aspiration of a person to prosecute a well-known case to additional their profession.
Article I, Part 6, Clause 1:
The Senators and Representatives shall obtain a Compensation for his or her Providers, to be ascertained by Legislation, and paid out of the Treasury of the US. They shall in all Instances, besides Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest throughout their Attendance on the Session of their respective Homes, and in going to and getting back from the identical; and for any Speech or Debate in both Home, they shall not be questioned in some other Place.
The Founding Fathers understood the hazard of permitting the Justice Division to intervene in politics. They CANNOT arrest any senator or congressman for ANY crime to stop them from attending or voting on something. They clearly by no means anticipated this similar abuse of course of could be used towards the president. He CANNOT be the only real exception that permits anybody within the Justice Division to indict a president for private achieve both to additional their profession or they’ve been bribed.
Article II, Part 4:
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the US, shall be faraway from Workplace on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or different excessive Crimes and Misdemeanors.
The Structure provides Congress the authority to question and take away the President, not the Division of Justice or any state prosecutor. This provision was inherited from English follow, by which Parliament impeached and convicted ministers and favorites of the Crown in a battle to rein within the Crown’s energy, or in our case – Government Energy.
Congress’s energy of impeachment is an essential test on the Government and Judicial Branches, acknowledged by the Framers as an important instrument for holding authorities officers accountable for violations of the legislation and abuses of energy. This was specified by The Federalist Nos. 65, 81 (Alexander Hamilton) (Rossiter ed., 1961). We discover within the Federalist Papers a very good deal extra consideration to the Senate’s distinctive function of figuring out whether or not to convict presidents or different excessive officers who’ve been impeached by the Home. The Founding Fathers clearly NEVER envisioned the Division of Justice bringing legal expenses towards a president. They clearly noticed the Home because the grand jury, which has solely the ability to indict. Conviction requires both a trial or a voluntary responsible plea. Subsequently, ONLY the Senate had the function to place the indicted president on trial – not some native choose. We’re coping with the Structure right here!
You might disagree with me since you hate Trump, however keep in mind, no matter you advocate towards Trump can be used towards the opposition sooner or later. You might be tearing aside the very cloth of civilization. So sure, my view is Trump MUST BE completely immune from prosecution by any choose or the Division of Justice. He have to be indicted (impeached) by the Home and placed on trial ONLY within the Senate. If we don’t adhere to this Constitutional jurisdiction, then the US can be torn aside by self-interest and corrupt prosecutors for political achieve.
I consider that Justice Alito’s feedback throughout the oral argument are the true query on which the US’ basis is predicated.
“If an incumbent who loses a really shut, hotly contested election is aware of that an actual risk after leaving workplace is just not that the president goes to have the ability to go off right into a peaceable retirement however that the president could also be criminally prosecuted by a bitter political opponent, will that not lead us right into a cycle that destabilizes the functioning of our nation as a democracy?”
Justice Alito famous that in different international locations, “we have now seen this course of” the place the loser of an election “will get thrown in jail.”
I knew Steve Moore, who was once on the Cato Institute. Trump had provided him a place within the Federal Reserve. Steve would have been a wonderful alternative. He declined due to the affirmation course of and the influence that might have on his household. If you tear folks aside for political functions, you discourage anybody from in search of such an workplace. What Justice Thomas and Justice Brett Kavanaugh have been subjected to throughout their appointment confirmations was outrageous going again to their highschool days. Accepting any such place at this time limit, one can not have a household, for they examine your partner and youngsters. All of that’s made public and thrown within the face of everybody.
When you can not see what they’re doing to Trump threatens the very existence and way forward for the US sooner or later, then it’s time to carry this experiment to an finish. No nation this divided can survive, and historical past bears witness to that assertion.
